visitors since 4 oct 2008

The Chim Chims Speak

The Chim chims are intel weenies as regular readers of the FRI blog have probably deduced.  They are all former members of our Armed Forces, they are all working in their field of expertise today with traditional Pentagon contractors and none of them is involved with this supposed “contractor spy ring.”  Despite this they have been all over this story and pestering me to post more on it.  I get too much attention when I do and remain concerned that blow-back from this story will eventually hit my friends and I who remain in the field working the reconstruction fight.  But I’ve been hanging out in Dubai on R&R and it is going to take some time to catch up on the day job so I’m throwing up a Chim chim post on the topic to cover me while I catch up with all the stuff I was supposed to be paying attention to when I was away.

My son Logan spent the last three months in Jalalabad with me teaching a class on digital photography for the MIT Fab Folk at the Jalalabad Fab Lab.  Here is the link to his blog (blogs are required on all Fab Folk missions) and I think it is hysterically funny which was not his intent.  This is probably his last visit to Afghanistan  – the security situation has degraded to the point where keeping him safe was a major operation.  Many thanks to my Afghan colleagues JD and Zaki for devising and maintaining a safety box in which Logan could operate and of course to Haji jan who watched over him every second he was out of my eye sight.  I’m inserting pictures of Logan and I on the range because it’s my way of bragging on my boy.  The remainder of the post is from Chim Chim.

With the recent spate of NYT blather about the U.S. Military’s use of contractors to conduct intelligence activities, the official kneejerk response from the Department of Defense (DoD) was to announce that the original contract was shut down, and that the Department was conducting investigations

Logan did his first four day handgun course at Frontsight (where I taught after retiring from the Marines) when he was 12. He is fast as a snake out of the holster - but he'll ten more years of practice to be faster than the old man

Logan did his first four-day handgun course at Frontsight (where I taught after retiring from the Marines) when he was 12. He is fast as a snake out of the holster – but he’ll need ten more years of practice to be faster than the old man

Officials say Mr. Furlong’s operation seems to have been shut down, and he is now is the subject of a criminal investigation by the Defense Department for a number of possible offenses, including contract fraud.

(Contractors Tied to Effort to Track and Kill Militants)

Geoff Morrell, a Pentagon spokesman, said Tuesday that Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates had ordered officials to assess the department’s information operations particularly whether information gathered and disseminated for defensive efforts was being used inappropriately to help stage offensive operations.

(U.S. Official Defends Contractors’ Mission)

What is disturbing in this entire hubbub is the absence of any official commentary challenging mainstream media assertions. What ever happened to the old cliche don’t believe everything that you read?  We know from this same reporting source that the program was not shut down. In fact, a piece of the program, the piece involving Mr. Pelton, was shut down last year. However, the entire program was not shut down because it was a legitimate, contracted information support service.  So the media got it wrong from the beginning. Big surprise there.

In addition to the lack of critical thought by the Department of Defense in response to media-backed accusations about fraud, there was no repeat, no effort to directly counter the implications that these contractors were conducting intelligence activities. In fact, DoD let the media become an arm of the U.S. national policy process by allowing it to dictate reality in the absence of fact. The Defense spokesman Morrell failed. He failed the Department, and he failed the Executive Branch because he did not step back and look at the media inquiries clinically enough to develop a reply in a way that reflected fact and policy vice conjecture.

When presenting from the holster the goal is to hit center mass consistently inside an area about the size of your hand. Hitting a 1 inch blach square repeatedly is little more than showing off - which is exactly what I was doing here.

When presenting a pistol from the holster the goal is to hit center mass consistently inside an area about the size of your hand. Hitting a 1 inch black square repeatedly is little more than showing off – which is exactly what I was doing here.

At the center of this mess are three key issues that, had they been explored, would have taken the wind out of this non-controversy. First, if you haven’t been paying attention, the U.S. Government contracts services. It has done so forever, and it saves money, keeps government smaller, and is more efficient as a result.   In fact, it contracts individuals to do intelligence related activities. Why not? With Congressionally mandated manpower limitations, employing experienced former or retired specialists at a fraction of the cost to the Government to supplement official capabilities-gaps is a no-brainer. One need only revisit the Department of Defense’s estimate that it costs the uniformed services roughly one million dollars a year per service member in combat. Comparatively, it costs less than half that figure to employ seasoned contract specialists in the same environment.

The second issue is the idea that these or any contractors would perform their respective tasks without a sufficient level of oversight.   Since the beginning of this war, Defense Contracting has had to deal with a plethora of scandals and oversight failures. In response, the bureaucracy has imposed draconian checks and balances to prevent fraud, insure contract performance, and to meet critical mission requirements. The idea that the contractors or their contracted service somehow exceeded the scope of the contract just does not make sense. Right?

Some Pentagon officials said that over time the operation appeared to morph into traditional spying activities.

(U.S. Is Still Using Spy Ring, Despite Doubts)

Though one could argue that some contractors work just as selflessly as their military counter-parts, it is inane to argue that any private corporation would risk its financial status or its business reputation to transition from providing information services to running something as complex or as risky as an intelligence network.

Third in the list of key issues are the statutory duties and responsibilities dictated under U.S. Code, National Law if you will. Under the U.S. Code, Departments in the Executive Branch have their own sections or Titles that specify their unique roles and functions. Those areas reserved traditionally for the Department of Defense fall under Title 10 and reflect the roles of organize, train, equip, and conduct national defense activities.   Separately, those functions set aside for intelligence fall under Title 50.   Title 50 has similar organize, train and equip mandates.   It also has special provisions that regulate national intelligence initiatives.   Those Title 50 elements are very specific, and are delegated to our national intelligence community (IC). Though generally controlled by the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), they have been extended to the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) as wellof course they have because he controls 80% of the national intelligence budget.

Though the SECDEF could have delegated Title 50 authority for these types of contract activities under some justification such as intelligence support to Information Operations, why would he? The scope, intent, and nature of the contract, from all descriptions, do not meet the threshold of intelligence.   Free Dictionary.Com does as good a job as any in defining military intelligence:

Military Intelligence

n. Abbr. MI

1. Information relating to the armed forces of a foreign country that is significant to the planning and conduct of another country’s military doctrine, policy, and operations.

2. An agency of the armed forces that procures, analyzes, and uses information of tactical and strategic military value.

However, such a definition is reflective of official definitions across the board and is the reason why the current dialog is of interest. As broad as this description is, the controversy between official agencies and departments is serving to constrain rather than empower organizational capabilities. Think about it!   Is information really intelligence? Intelligence is comprised of information, but there are a number of essential components to information that must occur for it to be intel-worthy. These components include sources, analysis, and relevance, to name a few.

Sources of information are a critical consideration. One can only imagine that any contractor operating in Afghanistan would be working with locals to provide feedback. How reliable that feedback is can only be characterized over time. In the absence of some formal, governmentally managed process to measure and validate these locals, any information is simply word-on-the-street or rumor. One can never judge the personal agenda of these local sorucesare they telling us something they think we want to here?   Are they feeding us information that someone else wants us to here?   In any event, any ongoing DoD effort, including support contracts, would violate the tenants of Title 50 (unless they were specifically capable of and hired to do perform intelligence functions with vetted sources). All information from whoever would have to be ignored because its intelligence and not my job, and our men and women in harms way would have to fight in a discovery learning environment stealing their commanders’ initiative and any tactical advantage they need to understand and dominate in a complex operating environment.

Logan is really good with a 9mm Glock but has little experience shooting hard ball from a .45 cal 1911. It is easier to get a clean break of the trigger with a single action 1911 pistol but the muzzle flip and recoil are much more difficult to handle. The reason why I use a .45 caliber handgun is because nobody makes a .46 caliber - the U.S. military 9mm Beretta is probably the worst military sidearm ever made and all but worthless in a gunfight. It is easy to qualify with which is probably the point....I guess.

Logan is really good with a 9mm Glock but has little experience shooting hard ball from a .45 cal 1911. It is easier to get a clean break of the trigger with a single action 1911 pistol but the muzzle flip and recoil are much more difficult to handle. The reason  I use a .45 is because nobody makes a .46 caliber handgun. With pistol rounds, as with most things in life, size matters.

Analysis of this information is equally essential to its value as intelligence. In this case, one would have to assume that DoD embedded analysts in the contract production process or was directly exploiting the contractors’ reports for analysis. The information could not be finished intelligence and thus potentially used to conduct some action or form some policy without that level of scrutiny. Of course, if DoD was doing this all along, then any argument of rogue officials or rogue contractors is lost because it would take senior level decisions to authorize limited analytical resources to be committed to such an effort.

Relevance of information is another important consideration in its relation to intelligence. Something not mentioned in the definition above is the idea that any information collected is answering some requirement.  In military parlance, priority information requirements (PIR) or intelligence requirements (IR).   Unless this rogue contract spy network is responding to some kind of official task to answer important questions, any information is essentially wide-area optics or open sourcea shotgun blast if you will. The information could answer any number of demographic, technical, and operational questions, and, yes, it may contribute to the body of information supporting intelligence. But, that last piece could only happen if some DoD intelligence official decided to use it. THAT MEANS that the contractor’s work may fill an intelligence information void. In and of itself, however, the information service was just thata service. There are a number of contract outfits out there providing these same types of atmospherics, and at any time that information could be of intel value.   They aren’t rogue?   Are they?   How the Government chooses to use contracted information products, as information deliverables, is the Government’s decision.

At the end of the day, the current Administration has not provided the needed manpower to meet the fundamental military exigencies in combat. Contracted logistics support, staff augmentation, local security, and even information support services are helping to fill those capabilities voids, arguably saving lives US, coalition, and Afghan. These services contribute, in their own way, to meeting the needs of our service men and women the most important resources we have.   So what is the problem here?

The Ramsdell Brief

Today a new collaborative project was launched by Kerry Patton called The Ramsdell Brief. Ramsdell was the middle name of Duane ‘Dewey’ Clarridge who mentored us while attempting to be a retired person on the coast of Southern California. Dewey was not that great at being retired but he was exceptional as a mentor. The mission of The Ramsdell Brief is to present thought provoking material concerning the challenges we, as a country, face on the world stage today. And also to throw in cool pictures because everybody loves them.  Here’s one from Dewey’s service last month.

Kerry Patton, Tim Lynch, Fawn Hall and Jason Amerine

Kerry Patton, Jason Amerine, Fawn Hall and Tim Lynch

I know – the world is a small place right?

Please check out my new post at the Ramsdell Brief here. And don’t forget to plug it (if you find it worthy) on your social media sites – we’re looking for page views and we don’t use click bait at The Ramsdell Brief – that just would not do.


Baba Tim

Crowd Sourcing the Answer to How the Taliban Launch Attacks Inside Kabul

This is a post I wrote in 2012 and submitted it to SOFREP. They passed on publishing it and  it’s been laying dormant in my files for two years now. The attack today at the Eid Gah Mosque which was targeting a compound belonging to the VIP Protection Unit made me think of it again. […]

Meet a Couple of Heros

This is a TBT post that first went up in 2010 and is posted now to help explain a Facebook post involving Ty and my Dad. Hero is one of those terms which comes up often in reporting about the military.  Not every service member is a hero nor is every hero we encounter in […]

Hotel California Naw Zad Edition

Facebook sent me a reminder about a post that went up 5 years ago and asked it I wanted to re-post it. I did then went to read and realized it was probably one of the better more prescient posts I ever wrote so here it is….back on the front page of FRI exactly 5 […]

What Is the Problem Here? Revisted

This was posted 5 years ago by one of the Chim-chims with whom I remain close. We are in the planning stages of building a site for guys like us to post on which means my lazy ass needs to be doing more writing and less running, lifting and dating site searching in order to […]

Free Range International Reviews the new film A War

Free Range International (FRI) was invited by our favorite Hollywood insider, the lovely Kanani Fong, to review the film A War. The editorial staff gathered on the Baba Deck of the Coastal Bend Taj on the night of January 22nd for the screening. We watched the film, all of us frozen in place until the […]

Kandahar Rocks

This is a post from March 2010 re-posted now as a reminder of how unstable most of Afghanistan has become in the past five years. There was a Taliban attack outside of the Kandahar Airport that killed over 50 people (Cartman says 61 in his reporting) two days ago. For those of us who spent […]

You Can’t Handle the Truth

This morning I was doing something I ought not be doing; reading the news sites (guaranteed to fill my bitter heart with enough anger to subtract a few months from my life span) when I came across an article on the latest failure of female officers to pass the Marine Corps Infantry Officer Course. The […]


Last week I received and polite email from Professor Richard Macrory of the Centre for Law and the Environment, University College London asking me for permission to use some of my photos of the Gandamak battlefield in his upcoming book on the First Afghan War.  When most Afghan expats hear the name Gandamak the first thing they […]